State Mortgage Broker Licensing

FACTA Amendments
Red Flags and Address Discrepancy Rules

In 2003, The Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA) was signed into law. This gave the FTC responsibility for writing the rules regarding the accuracy of credit file information, privacy considerations and fighting identity theft among other things.

Two Sections, 315 and 114, were not completed in the initial rule making of 2004. The FTC left these two sections unfinished, which were completed and enacted on January 1,2008 which require all financial institutions to be in compliance as of November 1, 2008.

Section 114 requires each financial institution and / or creditor to develop and implement a written Identity Theft Prevention Program. The “Program” should detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft in connection with the opening of new and the maintenance of existing accounts.

This is known as the “Red Flags Rule” because the FTC has designated 26 specific red flags that must be considered in the design of your organization’s Program.

These Red Flags are not obscure possibilities of a security breach that may or may not ever occur, quite the contrary. These defined Red Flags are common occurrences that are taking place in your operation any day at any time.

…You now are required to detect and respond to these red flags.


What makes the Red Flags Rule so significant is the required involvement of senior management, employee training and the oversight of service provider arrangements. In addition, November 1, 2008 you are required to be in compliance.

…What scares me is how may people are unaware of this new law and are out of compliance.


Section 315 requires covered entities to reconcile address discrepancies. If a person who has requested a consumer report from a consumer reporting agency (CRA) and the request included an address that differs substantially from the address on file at the CRA, then the CRA shall notify the user of the address discrepancy.

This “Address Discrepancy Rule” requires every creditor or financial institution, or any entity using a consumer report, to develop and implement policies and procedures to enable the user to form a “Reasonable Belief” that the consumer report relates to the subject consumer.

This means your organization must have a proper consumer identification program in place and confirm with the CRA the accurate address when you receive notice of an address discrepancy.

These two Programs do not have to be overly complex. They do however, need to be designed, approved by the board of directors and implemented into your organization.

I will cover everything you need to know to get into compliance in our brand new four-hour continuing education course called “Security for an Insecure Time: Privacy, Information Security and the Red Flags Rule. Click here to find out more about this revealing course and to register.

Protecting an individual’s private identifying information is one of the most profoundly personal issues of our time. I believe in today’s mortgage business this is becoming the new litmus test when choosing one mortgage provider over another. The latest research shows a linkage between your commitment to privacy and security to your reputation, credibility and trustworthiness in the marketplace.

…This is a new and defining issue when differentiating yourself.


These FACTA amendments are business and marketing issues as well as a legal issue. Knowing what you are required to do as they occur and having your program in place will determine if you stay in business or not.

Come join me as we take up these historic issues. Creating a safe information ecosystem is no longer a choice; it’s a legal matter. Click here to find the time and place most convenient for you.

Responsible Information Management is your business, so I hope to see you in class.

In the meantime, you have my very best.



P.S. Attorney Scott Green will be joining us for this extraordinary education event. Click here and reserve your seat right now.


Back to top